"Sometimes attaining the deepest familiarity with a question is our best substitute for actually having the answer." - Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe
In that sentence, I think that Brian Greene has summarized the attitude of many physicists, especially those whose training and experience has driven them into an over-familiarity with all the unanswered questions in modern particle physics. Quantum Mechanics has proposed too many inexplicable phenomena, with which too many physicists have become too complacently over-familiar. Quantum mechanics and classical physics just cannot be fully reconciled, too many say. Which would be fine if quantum mechanics then went on to explain everything that classical physics could not, but it doesn't. It attains the deepest familiarity with the questions and presents that as an alternative to having any answers.
But there are answers to all of the questions. If you would prefer a more simple explanation of all of the unanswered questions thrown up by Quantum Mechanics and other modern Quantum Physics concepts, along with their solutions, please do consider getting a copy of my book, which is detailed at the bottom of this page, after some very brief information about me. It is not necessary, however, to make any purchase in order to understand my Theory of Absolute Relativity; the following pages each take an important aspect of Quantum Physics, often referring to information published on the Net, scientific papers or other publications, and then applies my theory. Wherever I look in Quantum Physics, the Theory of Absolute Unified Relativity simplifies and explains, solving the problems that have confounded physicists since Einstein and Bohr.
So please do study the following pages, even if you do not choose to purchase a copy of my book; and do feel free to leave comments, as long as they are inoffensive and constructive.
- Unified Absolute Relativity
- The Copenhagen Interpretation
- Young's Double-Slit Experiment
- The Four Forces of Nature and Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum Entanglement
- The Polarization of Photons
- The Von Neuman Process
- The Born Rule
- Matter, Antimatter and Time's Arrow
- The Higgs Boson
- The Many Worlds Interpretation
- The Schrödinger Equation and Human Consciousness
Wednesday, 18 January 2017
Saturday, 3 December 2016
Since then, a small team of scientists, Dr Julian Barbour of College Farm in the UK, Dr Tim Koslowski of the University of New Brunswick in Canada and Dr Flavio Mercati of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, also in Canada, have published a scientific paper which reaches the same conclusion.
"Did the Big Bang create a 'mirror universe' where time moves BACKWARDS? New theory could explain our past - and our future
Scientists have proposed a radical new theory of time for the universe
UK physicist Dr Julian Barbour and others say there are two arrows of time
These move in opposite directions and both formed at the Big Bang
This means at the Big Bang there were two universes that formed
Observers in either universe would view the other as moving backwards
The inexorable tick of time moving forward is something that has puzzled scientists for more than a century.
But now a new theory has been proposed that may help answer some questions - at least with regards to the beginning of time and what happened in the 'past'.
They say that at the moment of the Big Bang a 'mirror universe' to our own was created that moves in the opposite direction through time - and intelligent beings in each one would perceive the other to be moving backwards through time."
Article by Gregory Walton, published by The Daily Telegraph on 10th December 2014:
Did the Big Bang create a parallel universe where time goes backwards?
Article by Andrew Griffin, published by The Independent on 11th December 2014:
'Mirror universe' suggests Big Bang created place where time goes backwards
Before 1st August 2013, there was no other published information on this theory. It was published by me first.